|Category Edit ? |
US (Comics) , Scan=Unfinished & No/Bad Ending
Hi! I am researching these isuess for a course I am developing. Having been a Harvard Classics graduate student (I am now a professor at University of Houston) I also know Jan Ziolkowski, whom I respect a great deal. So this question both intrigues and troubles me. Do you think that Harvard feels it has legal title because the antiquities were purchased prior to 1970? I am in no way attempting to excuse the looting or the purchase of looted objects, but I am just wondering if Harvard is making a purely legalistic argument, not an ethical one. Thanks for your excellent book and blog.
Last updated by Guest 1272 day(s) ago